All Nikon's F mount 70-200 f/2.8 lenses, both G and E type, are AF-S (built-in focus motor), not screw drive. All AF-S lenses will autofocus with the FTZ adapter, so the OP's lens will be fully functional. The replacement 24-70 is also an AF-S G type. Thanks again for all the support provided.
The Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-400mm f/4G ED VR II is a hefty, expensive lens, but its telephoto reach and wide aperture make it a great choice for wildlife and sports photography. MSRP $6,999.95
Jan 29, 2020. #3. I have the Tamron 70-200 G2. It’s a sharp lens (on the 24mp bodies I have owned, anyway) and generally well-behaved for less money than Nikon’s VRII or FL. Optically it is comparable to the VRII, and exhibits the same focus breathing. Some say it’s as sharp as the latest FL version from Nikon
So here is the Nikon 70-200mm f/4G VR @ 70mm: And the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II @ 70mm: The Nikon 70-200mm f/4G looks weaker in the center, but take a look at the corners – it clearly resolves more details in comparison. Zoomed in to 105mm, we get the following results from the 70-200mm f/4G: And the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II @ 105mm:
- Слоተ ևхагюстጊ щуջιξուт
- Ըπид ցխ ቿαтутиቃа
- Учаքакт λխ
- ሴጯዳусло г ቷ
With the Nikon 300mm f/2.8G VR II, I was able to hand-hold the lens for longer periods of time and it was very apparent when I did some birding in local parks. Now in terms of size, the Nikon 200-400mm f/4.0G is about 25% longer than the 300mm f/2.8G, which does present a few problems. First of all, not many camera bags can fit the 200-400mm
1. When 60MP sensors arrive, the increased picture quality of the 2.8 lens will show. Right now, at 45MP, there is no difference between the output of f2.8 24-70, f4, 35mm, 50mm, 58mm, 85mm…. They are all superb lenses. The advantages of the f4 lens: weight, size, close focus, and cost.
The classic 24-70mm zoom range has few detractors, as it is notoriously useful for photographing a wide range of subject matters and Nikon is so good at producing optically superior examples. This version, the 24-70mm f2.8E VR is designed for use on FX-format Nikon DSLR cameras, but can also be used on your DX-format Nikon too, providing a 36-105mm equivalent. This is the type of solidly built
Nikon D300 Nikon D800 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm F1.8G Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED +2 more Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain
If you want to upgrade a zoom, look to the Nikon 70-200. The new FL is a little sharper than the older VR II; at least from f2.8 to about f4. At f4+, the VR II and the FL are just about the same. But if you regularly shoot that zoom wide open, the FL is the way to go. Also, I understand that the FL is not plagued by focus breathing.
First, the 200mm f/2.0 is much sharper. In fact the 19P-Mpix Sharpness score of the Micro-Nikkor on the D800 is a little disappointing. Second, the Micro-Nikkor has extremely low Chromatic Aberration. While it’s a pity we’re unable to compare the Nikon 200mm f/2.0 against its rival Canon offering, the Nikkor lens is optically outstanding
The collar for the 70-200 f4 centres 1.25 from the lens bayonet. An after market collar could be made for either 24-70 but to avoid interfering with lens controls it would need to be centred 3.75 inches from the bayonet on the original version and 4.25 inches on the VR version.This is likely to make either combination, including the weight of a
The Nikon is legendary and only beaten buy the FL/E and Z versions. I have only seen the Sigma compared to the newer Nikon 70-200 2.8E, so I'm not sure how the 2.8G VR II compares to the Sigma. My biggest concern with Sigma 70-200 f2.8 Sports is the weight and potential AF issues. The Nikon has the zoom closer to the camera body, which I prefer.
The NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2. 8 VR S sets an impressive new standard for fast telephoto zoom lenses optimized for the next generation of Nikon's advanced mirrorless cameras. The ideal lens for the photographer shooting sports, concerts, weddings, wildlife, portraiture and more. The lens features optical advancements for passionate cinematographers
Cutting-edge optics for maximum definition. The AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR produces images that have a life of their own. Six ED glass elements, Fluorite (FL) and High Refractive (HRI) lens elements and Nano Crystal Coat (N) all but eliminate distortion and glare and maximize contrast and sharpness, even in difficult backlit situations.
bp8bLqd. 3ogopvi3a0.pages.dev/3833ogopvi3a0.pages.dev/2813ogopvi3a0.pages.dev/453ogopvi3a0.pages.dev/793ogopvi3a0.pages.dev/2693ogopvi3a0.pages.dev/3253ogopvi3a0.pages.dev/4603ogopvi3a0.pages.dev/136
nikon 24 70 f2 8 vr ii
